Why History–And Editorial Pages–Matter

What’s the most important book about Richmond and its history published in the past twelve months? I’ll give you a hint: the book has been favorably reviewed in the nationally read Boston Review, and the author has been designated by the History News Network as one of the nation’s “Top Young Historians,” but no review of nor reference to the book has yet appeared in the Times-Dispatch.

The book in question is Matthew D. Lassiter’s The Silent Majority: Suburban Politics in the Sunbelt South, published earlier this year by Princeton University Press. Lassiter, a historian at the University of Michigan, describes and critically assesses how the suburbanization of the 1960s and 70s affected local politics in Atlanta, Charlotte, and Richmond.

The crucial issue in that history, of course, is race, and in particular how whites responded to the reality of the end of formal racial segregation and the incorporation of African-Americans into the political process. Lassiter skillfully tells the story of how Richmond failed to create a regional political structure based on the idea that we’re all in it together, and instead opted for a system which perpetuates rather than alleviates racial inequalities.

The central episode of that failure, depicted at length in Chapter 11 of Lassiter’s book, was the busing crisis of the early 1970s and the Richmond region’s refusal during those years to create a system of effectively integrated public schools, achieved through the “consolidation of urban and suburban school systems.”

Lassiter gives particular attention to the role Richmond’s local newspapers played in defeating integration proposals. “In an extension of their enthusiasm for defiance during the massive resistance era of the 1950s, the Richmond Times-Dispatch and the Richmond News Leader maintained a shrill tone and encouraged an obstructionist stance throughout the three-year busing crisis. Expressing open hostility toward the black plaintiffs and the federal courts, the Times-Dispatch repeatedly invoked a doomsday scenario of coercive integration where ‘thousands of children ould be hauled away from their own neighborhoods to strange schools in strange communities miles away.’ . . .

The editorial pages launched a campaign of personal vituperation against [Governor] Linwood Holton after his refusal to exploit the crisis, which the Times-Dispatch attributed to the governor’s solicitation of black voters for the Republican party. The News Leader actively participated in the antibusing movement by circulating its own freedom of choice petition, signed by 29,122 readers and delivered to the steps of the Supreme Court by editor Ross Mackenzie and Senator Harry F. Byrd, Jr. . . . A community study of the Richmond crisis concluded that the editorial pages jointly created ‘an atmosphere of mass hysteria and defiance by fanning the flames of emotionalism and racial biogtry, which only served to poison race relations between blacks and whites at a time when understanding and mutual cooperation were desperately needed.'”

As Lassiter writes, the ultimate failure of efforts to create a unified metropolitan school system in Richmond “guaranteed an urban system debilitated by a fusion of race and class hypersegregation.” The disparity between Richmond public schools and those of the suburban counties, and the many consequences that follow from that disparity, remains the most fundamental structural problem facing the Richmond region.

Unfortunately, it’s also a problem that rarely gets acknowledged or addressed in the pages of the RTD in any meaningful way (other than in the columns of Michael Paul Williams). Indeed, there’s little in the pages of the RTD to suggest that the editorial board regards the educational disparities between its namesake city and the surrounding suburbs as a problem at all.

But there are one or two signs that just maybe the RTD is at least willing to revisit the legacy of white resistance to the civil rights movement. On October 3 and 10, the newspaper printed two letters regarding the massive resistance movement of the 1950s in Virginia, one by a Republican and one by a Democrat.

That’s a start. If the newspaper wants to go further and is wiling to take the difficult step of not only re-examing Virginia’s past but the paper’s own role in that past–and in creating the structure of inequality that characterizes the Richmond regions–they could do worse than taking the time to review Lassiter’s book or interview the author.

That would be a terrific step towards using the newspaper’s influence to address the sources of Richmond’s real problems, and might also mark a welcome turn away from the editorial politics of “personal vituperation” that still persist in good measure at the RTD. (Exhibit A: Sunday’s column by Mackenzie concerning Mark Warner’s withdrawal last week from the presidential race, which can only be characterized as a case study in ungraciousness.)

Published in: on October 16, 2006 at 6:49 am  Comments (5)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://richmondtalksback.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/why-history-and-editorial-pages-matter/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

5 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. Thanks for the recommendation, that looks like a fascinating book.

  2. There’s ALOT that hasn’t been published about that period in Richmond’s history. Oh, let’s see….

    …the 2 house bombings in Chesterfield in March of 1960 (which, strangely enough, cannot be found in back issues of RT-D from that period, but which the FBI has records of, or did)…the bombed church in Richmond in 1966…the tense stand-off between blacks attemtping to march and a huge crowd of young white toughs on Semmes Ave. in 1968, where Baines Supermarket used to be…..the 1965 Klan rally on Genito Road, near the old Southside Speedway, which attracted an est. 5,000 local supporters (this was in the Times-Dispatch)….

    Yeah, lots has been swept under the rug. And you’re right Mr. Williamson, dealing with history is extremely important for transitioning into the future.

    Click onto my name for more little-known history.

  3. Thanks for the comment..that looks like a very interesting blog you’ve started.

  4. Add to the list of shameful uses of a newspaper, the RT-D’s and now-defunct News Leader’s exploitative coverage of Henry Marsh’s tenure as Mayor of Richmond. Contrast that with the embarassing pandering during L. Douglas Wilder’s Reign.

  5. Thank you Mr. Williamson. I love history. I research it strictly as a sparetime hobby. But even so I spend countless hours in archive & map rooms, poring through old records on microfilm, etc.

    My sources for the above ‘racial’ info above goes like this (forgive me if any of the titles are a wrod-or-two off, because I’m reciting from memory):

    One day, several years ago, I was looking for a good book on VA History. I found one that was about the rise-and-fall of the Byrd Machine (“Golden Age of…” ???). Anyhow, I came across several refernces to a Klan influence on the Gubernatorial Election of 1965. So then I went looking for more on this…

    …I found something titled “Hooded Americanism”, which gave an overview of KKK activity in the United States. In this book was a section listing FBI Documented bombings in the South, during the 1950s and 1960s. This is where I found the mention of the “two negro homes” bombed in Chesterfield County VA in March 1960.

    Now, I later did find a tiny notation in a March 1960 Richmond Times-Dispatch of two homes that burnt on German School Rd. (then inside the county). But it mentioned nothing else. Don’t know whether its the same thing.

    I also came across a (forgive me if the title is off) “Report from the House Un-American Affairs…” that was made in 1967. This report detailed Klan activity, state-by-state, in the South at that point in time. It was here that I found a brief on the Richmond Church Bombing of 1966. According to the story…

    …Richmond Klan denied any involvement and even offered their own labour to help rebuild the chapel. The African-American members, naturally, denied their offering. The book did not say which church in Richmond this was.

    The standoff on Semmes Ave. came to me from an older (white) resident. He told me it happened right after MLK was assasinated. According to him, a group of local blacks began a march but were halted at “Baines Supermarket”. The man told me that there was a large crowd of young white males — with ball bats and other items — who blocked the marchers…

    …the Richmond Police were already at the scene, anticipating trouble, and after a (long?) standoff the Police chased everyone on both sides home.

    I have been told of many other incidents, from old residents of the city.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: